| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
| |
Co-authored-by: Ryan <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Co-authored-by: Nick Brassel <[email protected]>
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Co-authored-by: Xelus22 <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: dexter93 <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Co-authored-by: Joel Challis <[email protected]>
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|\ |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
the mutual exclusive POINTING_DEVICE_MOTION_PIN and SPLIT_POINTING_ENABLE influence if and how the `pointing_device_driver.get_report` is triggered. now the way the define is wrapping around an "unbraced" if leads clang-format to weirdly indent the first line in the 'SPLIT_POINTING_ENABLE' as the first command after the if.
this hints that any code addition in between the two - that possibly should run regardless, would break the if-def enabled code.
this can be solved by adding a pair of curly braces in the POINTING_DEVICE_MOTION_PIN part, to clearly denote which commands are to be skipped if the motion pin shows now activity.
Co-authored-by: Johannes <[email protected]>
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Co-authored-by: Ryan <[email protected]>
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
|\| |
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Fixes #21396
|
|\| |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
|\| |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|